• 0 Posts
  • 100 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • A lot of people want a good tool that works.

    This is not a good tool and it does not work.

    Most of them don’t understand that yet.

    I am optimistic to think that they will have the opportunity find that out in time to not be walked off a cliff.

    I’m optimistically predicting that when people find out how much it actually costs and how shit it is that they will redirect their energies to alternatives if there are still any alternatives left.

    A better tool may come along, but it’s not this stuff. Sometimes the future of a solution doesn’t just look like more of the previous solution.


  • These kinds of questions are strange to me.

    A great many people are using them voluntarily, a lot of people are using them because they don’t know how to avoid using them and feel that they have no alternative.

    But the implication of the question seems to be that people wouldn’t choose to use something that is worse.

    In order to make that assumption you have to first assume that they know qualitatively what is better and what is worse, that they have the appropriate skills or opportunity necessary to choose to opt in or opt out, and that they are making their decision on what tools to use based on which one is better or worse.

    I don’t think you can make any of those assumptions. In fact I think you can assume the opposite.

    The average person doesn’t know how to evaluate the quality of research information they receive on topics outside of their expertise.

    The average person does not have the technical skills necessary to engage with non-AI augmented systems presuming they want to.

    The average person does not choose their tools based on what is the most effective at producing the correct truth but instead on which one is the most usable, user friendly, convenient, generally accepted, and relatively inexpensive.

    50 million cigarette smokers can't be wrong!


  • A lot of those things have a business model that relies on putting the competition out of business so you can jack up the price.

    Uber broke taxis in a lot of places. It completely broke that industry by simply ignoring the laws. Uber had a thing that it could actually sell that people would buy.

    It took years before it started making money, in an industry that already made money.

    LLMs Don’t even have a path to profitability unless they can either functionally replace a human job or at least reliably perform a useful task without human intervention.

    They’ve burned all these billions and they still don’t even have something that can function as well as the search engines that proceeded them no matter how much they want to force you to use it.


  • Every particle accelerator that has been built has paid for itself in research value. There’s basically nothing that comes out of AI research except the need for a bigger model.

    The comparison is poor. Particle accelerators are science, LLMs do not produce science.

    That’s not to say that we couldn’t build LLMS that would be useful for scientific purposes but we’re not. That is not the function or the goal of the people building these things.








  • If the population starts demanding more they will make it harder for you to make demands.

    You might see things like social media sites that were open and free being purchased by billionaires and transformed into unrecognizable sewers.

    You might see things like protests violently suppressed by massive police presences that fire on crowds that are both unarmed and non-violent.

    You might see things like insane brazenly partisan gerrymandering and voter purges.

    You might see things like people being arrested and disappeared for the reviews that run contrary to the regime.

    If you see any of these things, you might be in trouble because it doesn’t matter how many of you demand UBI or food or shelter, bullets are cheaper and they’ve already shown that they’re willing to use them.


  • After the 2000 election it was obvious that Republicans played by different rules than Democrats.

    After 911 this country lost its fucking mind. Like millions and millions and millions of people just became fucking psychopaths. All of a sudden everybody was willing to split hairs on torture, child murder, forced starvation, warrantless wiretapping, indefinite detention, extraordinary rendition, double tap drone strikes The list goes on.

    We became completely fucking insane. It was obvious at that point this is where we were headed. That was when I realized I needed to register as a Republican. Democrats don’t care about my primary votes if they even hold one but in my youthfully naive hope I entertained the idea that you could democratically affect anything.

    Aside from the extra good feels of getting to vote against Donald Trump multiple times, The only real benefit is that I get visits from local Republican party officials and they think I’m one of them.

    I always put on my home accent and complain about liberals but I don’t think they understand that they are just liberals of the God bothering type to me and I seek to dismantle them from root to stem. … … But please tell me about this canvassing operation you have in my town… What kind of cars are they driving? Just curious






  • The officer should have asked. That’s when you could tell him you don’t consent to a search. It’s a bad idea to do this for a lot of reasons but that’s not one of them.

    If someone is searching through your pockets without your approval and against your wishes, they better hope they are right to do so and are taking all of the necessary precautions.

    You’re not under any obligation to make the private contents of your pockets safe for other people to rifle through.