HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-21日前Why make it complicated?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down126file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1282arrow-down1imageWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-21日前message-square96fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·22時間前It’s also valid rust syntax. But if it were rust, this meme would not make sense, since you would just type let a and type inference would do its thing. Which is much more ergonomic.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12時間前Type inference is a pretty big thing in TypeScript as well though. In fact it’s probably the biggest thing about it, IMO.
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8時間前I don’t know typescript. But if that’s the case, this meme doesn’t make much sense. Who writes the types of variables in a language with type inference unless forced by the compiler?
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5時間前Maybe it’s a language without type interference? Either way, it sometimes makes sense in TypeScript to help the type system out a little bit. let array: string[] = []; In this situation, the type system can’t infer that the empty array should be a string array, because there are no items to go by.
minus-squarenebeker@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·21時間前let a = String::from(“Hello, world!”).into() I’ll see myself out.
It’s also valid rust syntax.
But if it were rust, this meme would not make sense, since you would just type
let aand type inference would do its thing. Which is much more ergonomic.Type inference is a pretty big thing in TypeScript as well though. In fact it’s probably the biggest thing about it, IMO.
I don’t know typescript. But if that’s the case, this meme doesn’t make much sense.
Who writes the types of variables in a language with type inference unless forced by the compiler?
Maybe it’s a language without type interference?
Either way, it sometimes makes sense in TypeScript to help the type system out a little bit.
let array: string[] = [];In this situation, the type system can’t infer that the empty array should be a
stringarray, because there are no items to go by.let a = String::from(“Hello, world!”).into()I’ll see myself out.
At least be fair and cut out the
.into()