• danA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3日前

    I agree, but unfortunately it’s a reality of a capitalist society that large private companies have a lot of the wealth, and so people set themselves up for retirement by owning a very tiny part of those companies.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2日前

      Our retirement plans didn’t used to be tied to the stock market. So clearly there’s a way to have retirement plans that don’t tie the entire middle class to the success of every large corporation.

      • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2日前

        Well, there’s the Defined Benefit pension, however typically these pension funds then become institutional investors who seek to own shares in… you guessed it - stocks.

        At least those institutional investors are at least somewhat responsive to public pressure campaigns, as the state/local comptrollers are a politically appointed position.

        When you give your money to a 401k, the fund manager gets all the voting rights on the corporate board and is generally only accountable to “A reasonable rate of return”