Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-21 day agoThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up177arrow-down1external-linkThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-21 day agomessage-square69fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareChris Remington@beehaw.orgOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoThere! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
minus-squareMudMan@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 day agoReally? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
minus-squareThevenin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours ago@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
minus-squareChris Remington@beehaw.orgOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day ago You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? No. That feels a bit patronizing. That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
There! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
No.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.