andioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 7 个月前well that's rudeprogramming.devimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imagewell that's rudeprogramming.devandioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 7 个月前message-square34fedilink
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up60arrow-down4·edit-27 个月前At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did. https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
minus-squaresaimen@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 个月前Your source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.
At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did.
https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
Your source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.