I wonder if you could analyze internet discussions for an effect.

  • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    In my personal observations less intelligent people tend to have more children.
    Therefore population IQ drifts towards bottom.

    I suspect that’s because they do not fully understand all their future struggles and fates of their children in the world, fucked up by climate crisis and resource scarcity.

    • echolalia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This is the plot to a fictional movie. Intelligence is a factor of many things, and most of those factors are not genetic.

      Your observation seems close to the opinions of old school eugenicists. “The wrong people are having children”.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The intro to Idiocracy doesn’t actually mention genetics.

        Smart people value intelligence and people who value intelligence will raise their children as such.

        Parents who don’t value intelligence don’t raise their kids with intelligence in mind.

        Public schools aren’t actually about education. They’re about job training and obedience, so they wont fill the gaps the parents are leaving.

      • iarigby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        it is not genetic, it is environmental. Children of parents with less intelligence will not be raised to be intelligent. They might be lucky/resilience and try to get the most support outside the house, but it is much harder to accomplish, and often is even met with harassment at home, due to the rest of the family being insecure about their own lack of intelligence. And that is only if they rebel, which is not necessarily true as they will not only lack easy access to basic knowledge about the world/science, but will also not be introduced to the importance of learning about it from their closest figures of authority. Escaping that cycle it is even harder if the family is facing economic hardship, which is true for most modern families in general. It really isn’t that hard to figure that out, the kneejerk reaction that the statement always gets is annoying.

        • echolalia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          the kneejerk reaction that the statement always gets is annoying.

          I agree with everything you said, but I’m going to point out something. If there is a common kneejerk reaction to some particular topic, there’s probably a reason for that. You yourself said its annoying? I suppose its predictable then. If you can predict that people are going to react in some way, you can write with more explanation to clarify that you aren’t actually supporting something like eugenics. The poster I’m responding to did not do this.

          I took this lack of explanation as support (which, on reflection, might be leaping to conclusions). The overall tone of the comment is rather judgemental.

          The commenter is also wrong; IQ hasn’t been “drifting towards the bottom”, the average IQ increases every year. Its why they have to constantly adjust the tests, because 100 is meant to be an average score by design. This is primarily why I chose to respond to him. He’s not saying " which is why we should invest in family planning" or “we should invest in children’s education”, he’s making an untrue statement, and then pretending that this will cause some sort of feedback loop. Dumb people making more dumb people.

          IQ is not some absolute quantitative metric of intelligence. The people who treat it like it is… I find that a lot of them are pushing some sort of angle or simply don’t understand it.

      • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Intelligence is a factor of many things, and most of those factors are not genetic.

        You are very vague…

        • echolalia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Im not going to write some big long podt, just two things:

          1. people, on average, are not getting dumber. Anything you noticed observationally about dumb people having more children does not seem to have any effect on the world. Human nutrition has improved vastly over the past 100 years, as has education, etc.

          2. IQ increases every year. I don’t think this is evidence people are getting smarter because I think IQ is a poor measure of intelligence. I’m pointing this out to you because your statement about “IQ drifting toward the bottom’” is factually untrue.

            • echolalia@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Sorry, I thought this was in another thread that was actually talking about IQ. I’ve clicked through too many articles.

              This article doesn’t mention IQ at all, even though your response does. IQ isn’t an absolute quantitative measure for intelligence even though many people conflate them - this is probably why the article doesn’t mention it.

              I’d dig into the Financial Times article that this Neoscope article is about but it’s pay-walled. The neoscope article makes some case for intelligence declining (I don’t have time to read those citations right now), but I’d point out this doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with less intelligent parents having children. It could be evidence that the material conditions for us ordinary citizens is declining as a whole (I think we would both agree on that point). Cost of living is up, people are working longer. Long COVID probably has something to do with it, and stress.