• Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t trust MacOS, its proprietary code obviously hides evil spying and control functions over the user. Apple has always been an enemy of the free software community because it is not in favor of its loyal customers but only its greedy shareholders. There is no balance, Apple has always adopted anti-competitive measures. That’s just to say the least.

    • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It took the EU legislation to force them adapt USB 3 charger port. Their consumer base are their cows.

      • danA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        And even though they have USB 3 ports, it’s not even a proper USB 3 port as the lower-end models only support USB 2 speeds (480Mbps max)!

          • danA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lightning was also 480Mbps so I wonder if they just changed the port but kept most of the internals the same

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They claim that the die that they use for the M1 chip doesn’t support USB 3 standards but the die that they use for the M1 Pro chip does.

              Which is probably true, but they also made the chip so it’s not much of a defence.

              • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                they also made the chip so it’s not much of a defence

                It’s a pretty old chip though. They shipped it over a year ago and even that was mostly just an upgrade from LPDDR4 to LPDDR5. Which is a substantial upgrade, real world performance wise, but most of the engineering work would’ve been done by whoever makes the memory - not Apple’s own chip design team who presumably were working on something else (I’d guess desktop/laptop chips, and those certainly do have USB-3).

                Apple certainly could have included USB-3 support in those chips… but three years ago there wasn’t any pressing reason to that so and this year they’ve added support for the models with the most expensive camera. And anyone who cares about data transfer speeds will buy the one with the best camera.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even USB 3 it’s USB 2 delivered via USB-C. Because that’s something everybody wants isn’t it, slow charging on a modern standard that should be faster and indeed is faster on every other budget Android phone.

    • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Apple has always been an enemy of the free software community

      Apple is one of the largest contributors to open source software in the world and they’ve been a major contributor to open source since the early 1980’s. Yes, they have closed source software too… but it’s all built on an open foundation and they give a lot back to the open source community.

      LLVM for example, was a small project nobody had ever heard of in 2005, when Apple hired the university student who created it, gave him an essentially unlimited budget to hire a team of more people, and fast forward almost two decades it’s by far the best compiler in the world used by both modern languages (Rust/Swift/etc) and old languages (C, JavaScript, Fortran…) and it’s still not controlled in any way by Apple. The uni student they hired was Chris Lattner, he is still president of LLVM now even though he’s moved on (currently CEO of an AI startup called Modular AI).

      • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, look at the annual contribution that Apple makes to the BSD team and see that Apple uses several open source software in its products but with minimal financial contribution. Even more so for a company of this size. Apple only “donates” when it is in its interest that such software is ready for it to use.