“We are raising funds to support a critical legal defense in the fight against unchecked corporate power and a system that continues to favor the few over everyone else. This case isn’t just about one individual—it’s about challenging a status quo that protects the interest of the powerful at the expense of justice and fairness,” read one of the fundraising pages that was quickly removed by GoFundMe.

  • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lemmy world isn’t a government and you don’t want completely unrestricted speech on forums dude.

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Eh, I’m talking about speech that isn’t the direct result of real harm being done. I think the distinction is pretty clear don’t you?

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 minute ago

            No if it was then debates on what constitutes “speech” or “harm” wouldn’t occur.

            People can AI generate convincing CP images. Should those be allowed? Who was actively harmed? What about animation?

            I didn’t say who individually to kill I’m just saying people should go kill a certain group. Should that be allowed? Who was actively harmed? I can’t be held accountable for actions of randos who take my jokes and sarcastic comments literally!