Jorgelino@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前Very clever...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square299fedilinkarrow-up12.35Karrow-down119file-text
arrow-up12.33Karrow-down1imageVery clever...lemmy.mlJorgelino@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前message-square299fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up90arrow-down4·2 年前If anyone needs the command: :q! If you want the computer to ask if you’re sure: :q If you want to save: :wq
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up68arrow-down1·2 年前You’re nullifying that safety measure by doing this you know
minus-squareMadlaine@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·2 年前Some people just want to see the world burning
minus-squarePM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbtlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 年前Nah, the safety measure is designed to make sure they can quit vim. Now they can quit vim.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 年前I can quit vim any time I want. I just don’t want to.
minus-squarePoolloverNathan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·2 年前:wq will write even if you didn’t change anything; :x won’t. (similar to :w vs :up)
If anyone needs the command: :q!
If you want the computer to ask if you’re sure: :q
If you want to save: :wq
You’re nullifying that safety measure by doing this you know
Some people just want to see the world burning
Nah, the safety measure is designed to make sure they can quit vim. Now they can quit vim.
I can quit vim any time I want. I just don’t want to.
It’s the opposite of nerd sniping.
:wqwill write even if you didn’t change anything;:xwon’t. (similar to:wvs:up)Or :x
ZQ
and ZZ for save & quit
:cqbecause why not :)I prefer
ZZif I want to quit and save