Was trying to read a news story and… What fresh shitfuckery is this? Why do I now have to pay money to a company just for the privilege of not being spied upon and not getting your cookies that I don’t want or need? How is this even legal?

RE: “Why are you even reading that shitrag?” – I clicked on a link someone posted in another sublemmit, didn’t realise it was the Sun till after. I do not read the Sun on the regular, chill. My point stands regardless that this is extremely shitty and should probably not be allowed.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is a legitimate option per EU guidelines btw. They just want you to accept cookies.

    • danA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure the EU rejected this. Facebook tried the exact same thing except the paid version has no ads at all (so either you get tracked, or you pay for an ad-free untracked experience) and the EU’s initial findings were that it wasn’t compliant because every user should have the freedom to opt out of tracking without having to pay. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/european-union-says-meta-breaking-digital-rules-with-paid-ad-free-option-for-facebook-and-instagram

      Having said that, Brexit happened so I don’t know if the UK still follows the same laws.

      • ADTJ@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        EU Withdrawal Act effectively retained all applicable EU law as UK law so anything would have to be specifically rescinded after that.

        I don’t think anything’s changed wrt gdpr