• danA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s pretty good given (as far as I know) the main use case for HaLow is for low bandwidth, very low power use cases, like for IoT devices and other things you’d use Zigbee or Z-wave for today, including devices that run for years off a single button cell battery

    • qupada@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It sounds like you’re thinking of LoRa, another 900MHz radio protocol.

      LoRa has similar bandwidth to Zigbee (125kbps), and as you say is designed for low-power devices running on battery. I have PIR motion sensors at home which have used only around a third of their battery after 2 years.

      Security cameras seems to be a large target market for HaLow though, where you need a couple of megabits at a few hundred metres.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Serious question, why not use current wifi for that kind of distance?

        I know, it’s probably not really easy to make the comparison at this point - power usage is definitely part of that equation. Though the lower bandwidth of this doesn’t seem quite enough for video?

        Edit: I misread the bandwidth as 347kbit, not Mbit. So yea, this looks very promising for video, especially given the limitations of Wifi, plus using less power.