SpaceX’s Starship launches at the company’s Starbase facility near Boca Chica, Texas, have allegedly been contaminating local bodies of water with mercury for years. The news arrives in an exclusive CNBCreport on August 12, which cites internal documents and communications between local Texas regulators and the Environmental Protection Agency.

SpaceX’s fourth Starship test launch in June was its most successful so far—but the world’s largest and most powerful rocket ever built continues to wreak havoc on nearby Texas communities, wildlife, and ecosystems. But after repeated admonishments, reviews, and ignored requests, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) have had enough.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You have literally said that nothing anyone does at SpaceX is worthy of praise and complained that people praise SpaceX’s genuine accomplishments.

    Literally? Please quote me.

    But they’re not, they’re slightly slowing it’s rate of recovery.

    Please do show a study that rivals the University of Southern California which claims the exact opposite.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        So I didn’t literally say what you claimed I literally said, or even close.

        If I had said, “maybe people will finally stop praising Starbucks,” would you tell me that I was literally saying that baristas are bad at their jobs?

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          K, so when people praise SpaceX’s engineers for designing unprecedented machines that do things that no one has ever seen before, that doesn’t bother you?

          You were referring specifically to all those times that people are praising SpaceX’s environmental regulation compliance?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            When people praise SpaceX, the company, it bothers me.

            When people praise an engineer at SpaceX that does something cool, I am happy for the engineer.

            Again- saying I hate Starbucks doesn’t mean I hate the baristas who work there. Saying I hate Exxon doesn’t mean I hate an oil rig worker who’s just trying to make money to feed their family.

            And sticking just with Musk-owned companies, saying I hate Tesla doesn’t mean I hate some random Tesla employee I’ve never heard of.

            I’m really not sure why I have to explain this to you.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              When people praise SpaceX, the company, it bothers me.

              When people praise an engineer at SpaceX that does something cool, I am happy for the engineer.

              I’m really not sure why I have to explain this to you.

              You don’t have to explain either of those things to me, you can just answer the question I asked:

              K, so when people praise SpaceX’s engineers for designing unprecedented machines that do things that no one has ever seen before, that doesn’t bother you?

              i.e. when people praise SpaceX’s rockets and launches, does that bother you? Is that praising the company or praising the engineer in your mind?

              At the end of the day what the company does is an output of the workers. When people praise what SpaceX does they are praising the workers, unless you view the company as just the CEO, in which case you’re falling into the folly of hero worship.

                • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  No, that is referring to the idea of a corporation having legal rights the way that a person does. That is not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about the output of a corporation. Is the output of a corporation the result of the CEO or of a bunch of workers?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    See, the fun thing here is that I’ve answered the question you keep rephrasing multiple times the same way. You just don’t like my answer because it goes against your whole claim that this has something to do with Elon Musk.

                    And you are doing everything you can to defend a company which is destroying the ozone layer.