• vii@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unfortunately, Firefox is not as efficient as Chrome. On a battery powered devices this matters. Also it doesn’t have a native dark mode for web content.
    I’m this close to jumping the ship.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      Were having radically different experiences. Firefox consumes way less power than chrome on all my machines

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Chrome needs to be reinstalled every once in a while for some reason, or it will underperform.

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It drains battery on fresh installs for me. I just don’t bother. I don’t really see the appeal of chrome tbh. Obviously I have to use it occasionally since google content locks shit and so do employers, but there’s like… No real reason I’d use it as a daily driver. For my use cases and hardware its just plain worse

    • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Firefox is the only mobile browser I am aware of that allows extensions (including adblockers), and this let’s the user add functionality like having dark mode everywhere, even on sites that normally wouldn’t allow it.

    • danA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Ahh, I see. I’m usually on desktop PCs and use solar power at home, so the efficiency is less of a concern.

      AFAIK the “auto dark mode” in Chrome is experimental and doesn’t work well on all sites. Have you tried Dark Reader on Firefox? More and more sites are adding native dark mode, too.