• danA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    It runs fine, it’s just less efficient.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Where are you getting this from? Intuition?

      I think the quiescent current and losses are less in a well engineered psu.

      • hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is verifiable in manufactures data sheets.

        Efficiency at less than 20% and greater than 80% loads isn’t great relative to in between those ends.

        This is compounded by lower wattage PSUs being more limited with regard to features and benefits.

        If you end up with a 650w PSU and your system idles at 80 watts for the bulk of a working day you spend long periods of time in this less efficient window.

        We need to see some quality 300w to 600w designs come back onto the market.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, it depends on how much you’re spending: 80 plus titanium units, for example, are 90% efficient at both ends of the spectrum, which is as good as a 80 plus gold unit at the ideal 50% load.

          Of course, they’re expensive, and thus maybe not really the best solution since the wasted power is probably never going to add up to the cost of the better PSU, but there is enough of a demand for high and low load efficiency that it’s a thing that you could go buy.