I often daydream about how society would be if we were not forced by society to pigeon hole ourselves into a specialized career for maximizing the profits of capitalists, and sell most of our time for it.

The idea of creating an entire identity for you around your “career” and only specializing in one thing would be ridiculous in another universe. Humans have so much natural potential for breadth, but that is just not compatible with capitalism.

This is evident with how most people develop “hobbies” outside of work, like wood working, gardening, electronics, music, etc. This idea of separating “hobbies” and the thing we do most of our lives (work) is ridiculous.

Here’s how my world could be different if I owned my time and dedicated it to the benefit of my own and my community instead of capitalists:

  • more reading, learning and excusing knowledge with others.
  • learn more handy work, like plumbing and wood working. I love customizing my own home!
  • more gardening
  • participate in the transportation system (picking up shifts to drive a bus for example)
  • become a tour guide for my city
  • cook and bake for my neighbors
  • academic research
  • open source software (and non-software) contributions
  • pick up shifts at a café and make coffee, tea and smoothies for people
  • pick up shifts to clean up public spaces, such as parks or my own neighborhood
  • participate in more than one “professions”. I studied one type of engineering but work in a completely different engineering. This already proves I can do both, so why not do both and others?

Humans do not like the same thing over and over every day. It’s unnatural. But somehow we revolve our whole livelihood around if.

  • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “oh you dont wanna sell your time? why not just die right there right? surely you would not have to sell your time then!!”

    This is how stupid you sound. And if you read the rest of my post, I will repeat this again, I was talking about how I wish to live in a better society, not outside of society and in the woods. dont project.

    • ATQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s literally how societies work. You can do everything yourself, or you can cooperate with other people. Cooperating means spending some of your time doing their stuff so they spend some of their time doing your stuff. Cooperating means giving up some free time but probably having more free time overall.

      As is, you can have hobbies and interests now. Society isn’t stopping you from that either. You need to realize that your happiness is your responsibility instead of projecting onto the rest of us.

      A “not stupid” version of your question might have been “what would you like to spend more time doing.” But that’s not the question you asked. You decide to blame society for you being kind of a pathetic person.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can do everything yourself, or you can cooperate with other people.

        Please reread their post. That is what they want, but are unable to do because of capitalism.

        Capitalism does not encourage cooperation. It encourages competition and domination. Competition between businesses and individuals, and domination of the working class by the state and capital.

        The work one has to do under capitalism, i.e. wage labour, is not simply “cooperation”. That would entail an agreement between equals. It is a coercive arrangement enforced by the state in which people must submit to the whims of an employer or else risk joining the ranks of the unemployed, or worse, the homeless, the presence of which is a necessity under capitalism as both a sobering reminder of what’s at stake, and also to ensure there are always more people to employ.

        You can - to a degree - choose who you work for, but to no extent can you choose whether you work.

        • ATQ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can - to a degree - choose who you work for, but to no extent can you choose whether you work.

          That’s literally how life and any society works. Let’s rewind all the way to the beginning. If OP doesn’t like working in a society they can fuck off to the wilderness. But! Frontier survival would actually be more work and danger and less free time. Or, OP can move. But it turns out Western societies generally have shorter work weeks than the rest of the world. So what’s OP left with? Misplaced angst and the glaring unwillingness to take control of their own life.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s literally how life and any society works.

            No, it’s really not. Not every society forces you to seek wage labour. This is only the case in capitalism.

            Let’s rewind all the way to the beginning. If OP doesn’t like working in a society they can fuck off to the wilderness.

            No, they can’t. The government would hunt them down. But again, it’s not society in general they’re against. It’s capitalism. It’s stunning that you conflate the two.

            But! Frontier survival would actually be more work and danger and less free time.

            Okay but they weren’t gonna do that. Nor is it the only way to not have to do wage labour.

            We could instead transition our economy to one that operates on the basis of need instead of profit. Then people can choose how they work, without it defining their life:

            For as soon as the distribution of labour comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity, which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood; while in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic.

            • Karl Marx, The German Ideology

            Or, OP can move.

            Are you really stating this as a genuine option?! Do you know how fucking expensive that is??

            But it turns out Western societies generally have shorter work weeks than the rest of the world.

            The “rest of the world” predominantly includes other capitalist societies. Ones which the West forcibly made so, and made subservient, forcing down their wages and strongarming them into supplying us with cheap labour and goods. Not the best point you could have made.

            So what’s OP left with?

            Agitating for class consciousness and solidarity with fellow workers

            Misplaced angst and the glaring unwillingness to take control of their own life.

            Why is it misplaced? Also, it’s quite clear they are more than willing to take control of their life, but have obstacles in the way.

            • ATQ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not every society forces you to seek wage labour. This is only the case in capitalism.

              What’s an example of a society that doesn’t require work?

              You seem really hung up on the term” wage labor”. That’s not the only way to create or store value. But it is the most efficient. We could completely eliminate “money” but the concept of value would remain. And cooperation would only be more difficult and less efficient if I didn’t want to barter my chicken for your potato. Money, and “wage labor, regardless of who pays your wages, allow for the transfer of goods and services between individuals who don’t need the others goods or services now.

              The government would hunt them down.

              No they wouldn’t. Because except for your family and friends, nobody gives a fuck about you. It’s hilarious that y’all think this is even a possibility. I mean seriously, if I went missing tomorrow, would you know or care? And if not, why would anyone else?

              Are you really stating this as a genuine option?! Do you know how fucking expensive that is??

              This is absolutely an option. People all over the world do it every day.

              Agitating for class consciousness and solidarity with fellow workers

              Moving seems easier, quicker, and more effective. But this could work too. Carry on.

              Anyway, always fun to chat with college communists. Have a great day.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s stunning to me that you can’t conceive of another way for goods to be stored or distributed. Community stores? Mutual aid? Never heard of these? There is no need for money or any analogue. Bartering is also kind of a myth. No one ever participated in bartering on a large scale, even before money. People just gave each other things, all the time.

                Relevant terms for further reading:

                Mutual aid

                Gift economy

                Library economy

                Also, yes, the government would hunt you down because you’d no longer be paying taxes. They kinda don’t like that.

                Moving is not an option if you don’t have enough money, and no way to earn it.

                One last thing - I left college a decade ago. :)

      • darq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s literally how societies work.

        There are many ways that societies can work. Criticising the way society currently works is not criticising all possible societies. The options are not “accept things the way they are” and “bugger off into the wilderness”.

        • ATQ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s a society that isn’t premised on cooperation? Capitalism, communism, and essentially every other form of society are simply differences in how the money is divided up. They’re not differences in the belief that members of society have to work.

          The options are not “accept things the way they are” and “bugger off into the wilderness”.

          I mean, OP can move to a different society. OP could also stay and vote but I suspect that type of cooperative government might not be what they’re after. So yeah, in general, acceptance and fucking off are the only two real, immediate, choices OP can make. And in the context of this thread, asking OP this question is a great way to get to the point of their complaint.

          • darq@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s a society that isn’t premised on cooperation?

            Are you being deliberately obtuse? Because nowhere has anyone said they oppose cooperation.

            Capitalism, communism, and essentially every other form of society are simply differences in how the money is divided up.

            Boy howdy that seems like an ENORMOUS difference.

            • ATQ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because nowhere has anyone said they oppose cooperation.

              That is what OP is saying. They want to know what we’d do if we weren’t forced to sell most of our time.

              Boy howdy that seems like an ENORMOUS difference.

              I agree. But again, that’s not what OP is talking about. As we’ve established, any society requires cooperative work. Neither you or OP has argued that another system wouldn’t require OP to “sell most of their time.” If you’d like to make this argument you might be interested to start here.

              • darq@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That is what OP is saying.

                No it isn’t. That’s something you have hallucinated.

                They want to know what we’d do if we weren’t forced to sell most of our time.

                There’s a lot of options between having to spend the majority of our time dedicated to work, and not cooperating at all.

                Not to mention most of the work we do isn’t for the benefit of our communities, but for the benefit of a tiny handful of already-incredibly rich assholes.

                I agree. But again, that’s not what OP is talking about.

                That would be convenient for your argument, but actually, you do not get to decide what other people are talking about based on what is most convenient for you to argue against.

                • ATQ@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I read OPs post. I quoted it back to you. Both you, and OP, are implicitly arguing that you should be able to both fuck off AND have the benefits of society. That’s actually one of the perks of a functioning society where a member who is to old, sick, or otherwise unable to contribute can be taken care of. Do one of these apply to you or OP? If not, you’re no different than the “already rich assholes” except that you’re takers who are bad at capitalism.

                  Anyway. Have a nice day.

                  • bermuda@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    hey so i read all your comments here and I feel like it would have been far less of a waste of your time (and others) to just ignore the whole capitalism thing and answer what you’d do with your free time if you had more free time.

                  • darq@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Both you, and OP, are implicitly arguing that you should be able to both fuck off AND have the benefits of society.

                    No. I’m not. I’m telling you I’m not. Despite whatever nonsense you are hallucinating, that isn’t the argument I’m making.

                    Society can be structured differently. So resources can be distributed more fairly. So everyone can enjoy more of their time. Instead of a greedy few getting most of the benefit at the expense of the rest of us.

                    Anyway. Have a nice day.

                    Bite me, asshole.

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Both you, and OP, are implicitly arguing that you should be able to both fuck off AND have the benefits of society.

                    No, they’re not.

                    That’s actually one of the perks of a functioning society where a member who is to old, sick, or otherwise unable to contribute can be taken care of.

                    It should be, but this is becoming less and less the case as welfare, social security and pension plans keep getting cut and gutted.