• BigNote@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It probably depends on your age. To people my age (gen x) he’s definitely more famous than either of those guys. He was all over the place in the 80s.

    • KIM_JONG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So was Ronald Reagan, Madonna, Bob Sagat, John Elway, Eddie Murphy and hundreds of other people I won’t bother listing that were more significant than some pro wrestler.

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not arguing that he was more significant, just that he was pretty fucking famous. What part about this do you not understand?

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am also Gen X, and the fact that I remember Sgt Slaughter and the Iron Sheik doesn’t make them historically relevant. My point is that none of them are. John Glenn. JFK. Barack Obama. Donald Fucking Trump. Maggie Thatcher. Muhammad Ali. Mike Tyson. Michael Jordan. Madonna. Bowie. Elton. Michael Jackson.

      Those are the kinds of people who are historical figures. Hulk Hogan will be forgotten. He’s nowhere in the league of those kinds of people. He’s at best a D-list celebrity whose next headline will probably be his obit, after which no one other than fans of the 1980s wwf will remember him, and there’s going to be fewer of them every year.

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, no doubt, but still totally irrelevant to the fact that if you’re of a certain age, Hulk Hogan is way more famous than the Tiger King guy and Dog The Bounty Hunter.

        I’m not here to defend his historical significance; that’s something you brought in and has nothing to do with my position.