Not willing to give them ideas so fast.

That’s something that popped in my head as soon as I started in here, not so long ago.

But there’s nothing to prevent that, right? I mean, Meta could very well create a meta instance on Lemmy or Kbin or Mastodon or in all of them, bring a bunch of users, sprinkle in some ads because why not.

Sure, they could be defederated from more restrictive insfances. In the bigger picture, every other instance could boycott them, but they would surely federate among themselves (Elon meets Mark, ugh). They also have all the computational power and would have no problem being the largest instances in the Fediverse.

Then what? Is that feasible? Probable? My utopian future about a free, descentralized Fediverse is a lie?

  • Ungoliantsspawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly is not a big deal. Some specific instance might start behaving like aholes because of corporate greed or anything else.

    All they can do is take their specific communities down. The affected communities can always move to other instance (that is easier than changing to a different system all together).

    Changing platforms will always be harder than just switch instance because you instance changed the rules on you.

    • _finger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The word “millions of eyes” tends to start attracting corporate overlords. When we hit a million users I think things might start changing.

  • alexgranford@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are few corporates spinning up their instances, Mozilla, Vivaldi, few others for sure.

    Not a big deal.

    Social media monsters could either open up their own instances or enable ActivityPub integration from their main services, either way this will be interesting to watch. Any of these steps, I am sure, are very carefully evaluated as we speak, from commercial, policy and compliance, brand, risk perspectives.

      • CMLVI@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They choose to not federate, or no one will federate with them?

        I can’t imagine creating an instance and then just choosing not to federate. Lol kinda defeats the purpose.

        • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t imagine creating an instance and then just choosing not to federate. Lol kinda defeats the purpose.

          Isn’t that just taking working open source code and privatizing it? Makes sense to me. If you want a Twitter clone you have that in an instant.

  • karrbs@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was actually just thinking this when thinking about switching to @pixelfed i was thinking what if Instagram just converted to federated instance. How that would look

  • LollerCorleone@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Medium already has an instance, and so does Vivaldi. Tumblr is planning on supporting federation. Although not really a corporate, Mozilla is also setting up its own instance (which is something I am happy about).

    Worst of all, Meta is coming up with an ActivityPub platform. I am going to dread the day when my timeline will be flooded with posts from them.