Firefox on Debian stable is so old that websites yell at you to upgrade to a newer browser. And last time I tried installing Debian testing (or was it debian unstable?), the installer shat itself trying to make the bootloader. After I got it to boot, apt refused to work because of a missing symlink to busybox. Why on earth do they even need busybox if the base install already comes with full gnu coreutils? I remember Debian as the distro that Just Wroks™, when did it all go so wrong? Is anyone else here having similar issues, or am I doing something wrong?

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Debian is working as intended. You are wanting to use Ubuntu or Mint if you want more up to date packages.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      They can just use Flatpak as it will be the newest outside of Arch. Alternatively they could run Distrobox with something like Fedora.

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I stopped using flatpak when I found out both I had to update outside of the package manager. Also using flatpak gave me some issues with my sound card, so I just run the .deb. To each their own though, which is why I love Linux.

    • tritonium@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      mxlinux is my goto, and if you need something current there us always flatpak for most popular apps