As soon as Apple announced its plans to inject generative AI into the iPhone, it was as good as official: The technology is now all but unavoidable. Large language models will soon lurk on most of the world’s smartphones, generating images and text in messaging and email apps. AI has already colonized web search, appearing in Google and Bing. OpenAI, the $80 billion start-up that has partnered with Apple and Microsoft, feels ubiquitous; the auto-generated products of its ChatGPTs and DALL-Es are everywhere. And for a growing number of consumers, that’s a problem.

Rarely has a technology risen—or been forced—into prominence amid such controversy and consumer anxiety. Certainly, some Americans are excited about AI, though a majority said in a recent survey, for instance, that they are concerned AI will increase unemployment; in another, three out of four said they believe it will be abused to interfere with the upcoming presidential election. And many AI products have failed to impress. The launch of Google’s “AI Overview” was a disaster; the search giant’s new bot cheerfully told users to add glue to pizza and that potentially poisonous mushrooms were safe to eat. Meanwhile, OpenAI has been mired in scandal, incensing former employees with a controversial nondisclosure agreement and allegedly ripping off one of the world’s most famous actors for a voice-assistant product. Thus far, much of the resistance to the spread of AI has come from watchdog groups, concerned citizens, and creators worried about their livelihood. Now a consumer backlash to the technology has begun to unfold as well—so much so that a market has sprung up to capitalize on it.


Obligatory “fuck 99.9999% of all AI use-cases, the people who make them, and the techbros that push them.”

  • LEX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ah, you are picking apart the examples instead of taking in the point. Well, I tried.

    To answer your question, yes. Automatic1111 and ComfyUI are two of the most popular.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was a terrible and irrelevant point, as I explained. Thanks for the links though, I will check them out.

      • LEX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s really not.

        Maybe someday you’ll do some research into the history of art and music and get some context into how technology has influenced both and the repeating patterns of the reactionary art that tends to get produced by artists you’ve never heard of when that happens.

        Or maybe you won’t!

        Either way, good luck.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Err, you admitted yourself that you are absolutely clueless when it comes to AI music generation. So yes, your “point” was a bad one and clearly came from a place of complete ignorance.