• far_university1990@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    if 10500 mean 6p4e and 10400 mean 4p8e, which is faster depend on workload. so compare by that not good and that how currently is.

    also if then 10900 is 12p0e, maybe not faster for gaming if game is single thread, so compare broken again. and also not good for mobile device that care about battery life. who tell you that?

    and yes, basically that just most important or most compared spec concatenated. which describe the cpu, i think a name is supposed do that.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      And how many people do you think could accurately, or even ballpark, estimate their workload? I couldn’t tell you, whether my workload would benefit from more e or p cores and by how much.

      What you’re implying here is an illusion of accuracy. You want accurate numbers for something that you can’t really judge anyway. These numbers don’t mean anything to you, they just give you the illusion of knowing what’s going on. It’s the “close door” button in an elevator.

      • far_university1990@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You think intel could? look at current and past name, they cannot

        also you ask to encode difference of cpu into name, which i did. not to get good name that everyone can get from what they need know. people too different, would need to have different name for different people.