Kokesh@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle is losing itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down11
arrow-up118arrow-down1imageGoogle is losing itlemmy.worldKokesh@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareOtter@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIt could also be A/B testing, so not everyone will have the AI running in general
minus-squarecredo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIt’s not A/B testing if they aren’t getting feedback.
minus-squareOtter@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoWouldn’t they be? They could measure how likely it is that someone clicks on the generated link/text
minus-squarecredo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoJust because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate. More importantly, that text isn’t “clickable”, so they can’t be measuring raw engagement either.
It could also be A/B testing, so not everyone will have the AI running in general
It’s not A/B testing if they aren’t getting feedback.
Wouldn’t they be? They could measure how likely it is that someone clicks on the generated link/text
Just because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate. More importantly, that text isn’t “clickable”, so they can’t be measuring raw engagement either.