narwhal@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square213fedilinkarrow-up11.79Karrow-down115cross-posted to: webdev@programming.devfirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comnarwhal@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square213fedilinkcross-posted to: webdev@programming.devfirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down6·1 year agoIt’s not slower, and the rare incompatibilities can be solved by changing the user agent, which shows it’s artificial.
minus-squareThaNookLmao@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agotry not to ruin the user experience to make more money challenge (impossible)
minus-squareContend6248@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThey fight an uphill battle because lazy web devs optimize for Chrome and Firefox is a 2nd class citizen, but they do rock the last couple of years.
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoSometimes changing just the user agent isn’t enough FWIW.
It’s not slower, and the rare incompatibilities can be solved by changing the user agent, which shows it’s artificial.
try not to ruin the user experience to make more money challenge (impossible)
They fight an uphill battle because lazy web devs optimize for Chrome and Firefox is a 2nd class citizen, but they do rock the last couple of years.
Sometimes changing just the user agent isn’t enough FWIW.