• bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You don’t have to track a car to limit how fast it goes. Speed governerors exist inside gas powered cars already. All that has to be done is 1) legally require a manufacturer to limit speeds of their vehicles, and 2) prosecute them when they do not implement those restrictions. The rest is lawyers and lines of code (and lines of coke I guess)

      • suodrazah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        You need location data to be able to determine what limit to impose.

        And I bet you anything it will be a cloud based system.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            They don’t transmit the speed limit of the current road, and for things like construction they’ll need real-time updates.

            I’m certain they won’t want to push the entire database out to every vehicle for every update…

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I have a hard time believing it would be impossible to wire up a device that sends out a wireless signal with the local speed limit at every speed limit sign.

              Why does it need to go to a database for it instead of have a receiver on the vehicle itself to pull data as it passes speed limit signs?

              In fact, a centralized database would likely have more problems with not being accurate or current. Have you ever dealt with government databases?

              Edit: Part of the reason the database would be trash is because speed limits are set by cities, not by the state. So in the database scenario every time a city updates their speed limit, they have to document all the zones and upload them to the database. All it takes is paperwork getting backed up a week for that to cause problems.

                • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  We got a tough guy here.

                  EDIT: Also I’m fairly sure that destruction of government property is a felony and if it’s wired for this, it could easily be wired to take and send photos when tampered with, but you do you. I guess people do just hate infrastructure more than *checks notes… being spied on. Because when given an alternative without a database, they shit on it.

    • noride@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      To allow for vehicles to pass one another before the end of this century.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If they’re going fast enough that the speed limit isn’t fast enough to pass them, maybe you don’t need to pass them.

        If I’m stuck behind a tractor on the road, they’re probably going 15 mph and I can easily pass them by just going the speed limit. If you’re stuck behind someone going 50 in a 55, tough luck. It’s not like you’re losing that much time anyway.

        You save like 3 minutes over 30 miles. It’s nothing. People just think it’s so much faster because they don’t do the math.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            🙄 That leapfrog shit where you zip in and out of crawling traffic every time there’s a gap is dangerous and people shouldn’t do it in the first place. If traffic is super slow then the speed limit is easily fast enough to pass anyway.

            Also, it shouldn’t be your job to speed to make up for bad traffic. That’s a failure of public policy and engineering. We should fix that.

            • nicetriangle@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              There are a number of scenarios where one might do 10+ over the speed limit to get around someone on the highway that does not involve the leap-frogging-in-crawling-traffic maneuver you’re referring to.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, you might want to get around them, but only to save a couple of minutes. If someone is going slow enough for me to give a shit, the speed limit is enough to pass. Otherwise, tough luck, you have to go 50 in a 55

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not being able to pass a slow car just angers people.

          People who are angry about the slow car are probably going to ride their ass.

          People riding other people’s ass don’t have enough following distance to react to an emergency brake.

          Now there’s an accident and traffic comes to a half.

          People coming up from behind are in the same scenario.

          Now there’s a pileup.

          Congrats! You’ve now made the roads less safe.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            And pileups never happen when people speed 🙄

            You know what? You’re right.

            Let’s ban private car ownership.

            • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Let’s ban private car ownership.

              Or even better, just create viable public transportation, and discourage the plague of suburbia. Let the people who want to drive drive. And the people who only see it as a means to get from point A to B out of cars.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Except those people who want to drive have a huge burden on society for basically no reason. Fuck em. Nobody gets to drive.