• lolola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never heard of “tankies” before a week ago. Is this just a Lemmy thing? I’m new here.

  • Flinch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Michael Parenti, from Blackshirts and Reds:

    During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

  • CoinOperatedBoi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m an anarchist who gets called a tankie on Reddit for using the word “imperialism” and I approve this meme

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds like you struggle with nuance.

    Tankies are a very specific subset of “the left”.

    They support stalinist policies specifically.

    Thats very narrow in comparison to a vague “the left”

    ed. downvote me, idgaf. But maybe reply, discuss your position

  • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah g I’m not a fan of anybody who makes excuses for genocide, oppression of LGBTQIA+ folks, “forced resettlement”, or authoritarianism in general.

    Tankies are nowhere near as bad as the far right but they’re hardly allies. Historically, any time authoritarian leftists have taken control they’ve murdered all the anti-authoritarian leftists they could find in order to cement their power.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you saying they are the same, or that people think that they are the same? I’ve seen the meme used both ways

    • CoinOperatedBoi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe the point is that they’re equally vague knee jerk reactions to seeing trigger phrases and relevant social signifiers, as opposed to legitimate and useful political categories

  • Gerryflap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weird meme this one. I’m 100% against tankies, or at least the type of communist here who seems hellbent on defending regimes like the Chinese communist party or (especially weird) Putin’s Russia. There’s plenty of stuff wrong about western nations, but that is no excuse for defending dictators and authoritarian regimes. And I’m definitely not the angry pepe in the image, because by all classifications I would be part of the “woke left”.

    • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s your opinion of Nelson Mandela? The man wrote a book(although a revision of another book) called “How to be a good communist” and the very first line of that book is:

      A Communist is a member of the Communist Party who understands and accepts the theory and practice of Marxism-Leninism as explained by Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin , and who subjects himself to the discipline of the Party. (See notes 1, 2, 3 & 4)

  • balerion@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    as a woke leftist, i hate tankies because y’all aren’t leftists in any meaningful sense. the only difference between you and libs is which countries whose atrocities you justify.