.

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Haha very true, if micro was the default, many people coming from common GUI apps would be like “okay, ctrl z to undo” and “ctrl s to save” “wow, it actually worked”

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Absolutely. It would make sense as the default instead of nano (or vim of all things). Would help those who are just starting with Linux.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Def! I sort of wish the RFC committee would push standards for smart cross-platform shortcuts. Of course people with muscle memory in a different standard should be able to change for their usage, but even GUI apps like vscode, sublime text, IntelliJ, etc could benefit from standardization there

    • danA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nano has supported Ctrl+S to save for a while.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        True, but one keyboard shortcut doesn’t make for an easy transition. Unless nano is has implemented or is planning on implementing on ctrl o,z,f,y,q etc