You must log in or register to comment.
Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.
Google is getting better and better!!
Well have you counted them?
I don’t seem to have any particles around here I do have an awful lot of stuff but no particles.