• Mac@programming.devOP
    5·
    9 months ago

    Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      3·
      9 months ago

      Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      1·
      9 months ago

      Well have you counted them?

      I don’t seem to have any particles around here I do have an awful lot of stuff but no particles.