Australia is bigger than some people overseas imagine.
So here’s a quick comparison of Australian states to their US counterparts.
Tasmania is Australia’s smallest state, with a total area of 68,401 square kilometres.
That’s bigger than West Virginia, Maryland, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, or Rhode Island.
Australia’s second smallest state is Victoria, at 227, 444km2.
It’s larger than Minnesota, Utah, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, Washington, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Missouri, Wisconsin, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, New York, North Carolina, Arkansas, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Maine, Florida, or Pennsylvania.
Fun fact: Victoria is larger in area than Indiana and South Carolina combined.
Now on to the ones that might surprise you.
You know how Texans love talking up how big Texas is?
New South Wales is bigger than Texas.
And by quite a margin. NSW is 801, 150 sq km compared to 696,241 sq km for Texas.
South Australia is bigger than Texas, and Michigan. Combined.
SA is 984, 321 sq km.
Texas (696,241 km2) plus Michigan (250,493 sq km) is just 946, 734 sq km.
Queensland is bigger than Alaska.
Queensland is 1,729,742 sq km, compared to 1,717,854 sq km for Alaska.
That also means Queensland is bigger than Texas and California. Combined.
Texas (696,241 km2) plus California (423,968 km2) is 1,120,209 sq km.
You can add in Michigan too (250,493 sq km) and it’s still only 1,370,702 sq km.
That’s right kids. Texas, California, and Michigan combined are 359,040 sq km smaller than Queensland.
That leaves Western Australia. It’s 2,527,013 square kilometres.
How big is that? Well, the combined area of Texas and Alaska is 2,414,095 sq km, so pretty bloody big.
Wait you’re telling me that some arbitrarily designed geographical regions are bigger than some others?
Fun fact: the canton of El Chaco in Ecuador is larger than the county of Rutland in the UK
@drolex I’m telling you some arbitrarily designated regions are far larger than most people imagine them to be.
Put a much more simple and meaningful way rather than subdivisions: Australia is only about 5% smaller than the contiguous US (“lower 48”).
“I thought it was bigger”. Yeah maybe it’s not only about size, maybe it’s about how much fossil fuel is hidden underground