sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · il y a 7 moisUnsealed: Spotify Lawsuit Triggered Anna's Archive Domain Name Suspensions * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up1257arrow-down11
arrow-up1256arrow-down1external-linkUnsealed: Spotify Lawsuit Triggered Anna's Archive Domain Name Suspensions * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · il y a 7 moismessage-square77linkfedilink
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·il y a 7 moisThis makes Anna’s archive a bit problematic with that logic since when you pay for a paper you get a PDF copy?
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·il y a 7 moisThese companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·il y a 7 moisWell no, but in the same spirit of how you don’t own a movie just because you bought the DVD? I mean there are few things you actually own after buying them
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·il y a 7 moisI’m not sure what you’re buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.
minus-squareCenotaph@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·il y a 7 moisI would consider it more problematic if the author of the paper got any of that and not the journal the author had to pay to be published
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·il y a 7 moisThat’s a different point
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·il y a 7 moisNot when the vast majority of music rights holders are not the artists. Then it becomes a far more apt comparison.
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 7 moisThat’s a question of compensation, not ownership in any case
This makes Anna’s archive a bit problematic with that logic since when you pay for a paper you get a PDF copy?
These companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.
Well no, but in the same spirit of how you don’t own a movie just because you bought the DVD? I mean there are few things you actually own after buying them
I’m not sure what you’re buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.
I would consider it more problematic if the author of the paper got any of that and not the journal the author had to pay to be published
That’s a different point
Not when the vast majority of music rights holders are not the artists. Then it becomes a far more apt comparison.
That’s a question of compensation, not ownership in any case