Mog Spawn@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoDecomposed body in handcuffs, Nazi paraphernalia found in Stamford, Conn. gunman's home, police saywww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1169arrow-down13
arrow-up1166arrow-down1external-linkDecomposed body in handcuffs, Nazi paraphernalia found in Stamford, Conn. gunman's home, police saywww.cbsnews.comMog Spawn@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squaremfed1122@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoMaybe I’m wrong, but shouldn’t this grammatically be “Kapitulieren nicht”?
minus-squareKirp123@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up32·3 months agoHe was just a regular nazi not a grammar nazi.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoNo. The closest I can come up with would be “Niemals kapitulieren”.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoNot quite, “Kapituliere nicht” would be the correct imperative form, but sounds a bit weak. “Kapitulieren? Nein!” would work, but not without the question mark. No surrender would be “keine Kapitulation”.
Maybe I’m wrong, but shouldn’t this grammatically be “Kapitulieren nicht”?
He was just a regular nazi not a grammar nazi.
deleted by creator
No. The closest I can come up with would be “Niemals kapitulieren”.
Not quite, “Kapituliere nicht” would be the correct imperative form, but sounds a bit weak. “Kapitulieren? Nein!” would work, but not without the question mark. No surrender would be “keine Kapitulation”.