mudkip@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 14 hours agoI wasted all my generational luck for thisfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down13
arrow-up1280arrow-down1imageI wasted all my generational luck for thisfiles.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·13 hours agoIf this is reproducible without chicanery, I’m terrified
minus-squareNot_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·12 hours agoWithout chicanery? Yes Without luck? No
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·12 hours agoI think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It’s orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in it’s entire existence
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·7 hours agoI’d put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that’s so lucky it functionally should never happen.
minus-squareCookieOfFortune@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 hours agoAgreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random.
If this is reproducible without chicanery, I’m terrified
Without chicanery? Yes
Without luck? No
I think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It’s orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in it’s entire existence
I’d put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that’s so lucky it functionally should never happen.
Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation.
For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random.