As per fsf only those linux distributions are 100% free:

Dragora
Dyne
Guix
Hyperbola
Parabola
PureOS
Trisquel
Ututo
libreCMC
ProteanOS

Do you agree or no?

I see a lot of people that want to switch from windows to a linux distro or a open os. But from what i see they tend to migrate to another black boxed/closed os.

What is a trully free os that doesnt included any closed code/binary blobs/closed drivers etc.

Just 100% free open code, no traps.

What are the options and what should one go with if they want fully free os that rejects any closed code?

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No. You don’t get it.

    You have to switch to hardware that keeps its firmware safely hidden inside so we can call it “hardware”. If you let the firmware be updated, now it is “software” and it has to be free. But you can run in whatever “hardware” you want and be totally free.

    • vapeloki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t get what?

      There is a reason for the naming hardware, firmware, software.

      HARD, FIRM, SOFT.

      No, hardware das not bekomme Software just because it has firmware.

      And yes it would love to see free firmware.

      Look at CPU microcode. It is used to fix security issues in hardware. Without it you are vulnerable. Not using the property firmware blob to update the microcode is a very very bad idea. Does that make the CPU software…