Trump’s administration is demanding states “undo” full SNAP benefits paid out under judges’ orders last week, now that the U.S. Supreme Court has stayed those rulings, marking the latest swing in a seesawing legal battle over the anti-hunger program used by 42 million Americans.

The demand from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came as more than two dozen states warned of “catastrophic operational disruptions” if the Trump administration does not reimburse them for those SNAP benefits they authorized before the Supreme Court’s stay.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s not just the hungry people directly affected but all the businesses that those people can’t afford to use that are feeling the flow on effects. The economy won’t look to good after this mess.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I hate how “think of the economy” comes before “think about the starving people”

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        At least on the most basic of levels these are the same thing more or less. You don’t get people starving without a fucked up economy and that usually has further knock on affects, problem is the rich have directly conflated their own wealth with the economy for so long that some people act like they’re the same thing when they aren’t. I could wipe out Walmart tomorrow and while it’d suck in a lot of areas it wouldn’t immediately implode the economy if you did the same to every small business in say Redlands California itd probably shitcan a solid percentage of the San Bernardinos county economy.