“The new device is built from arrays of resistive random-access memory (RRAM) cells… The team was able to combine the speed of analog computation with the accuracy normally associated with digital processing. Crucially, the chip was manufactured using a commercial production process, meaning it could potentially be mass-produced.”

Article is based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

  • jali67@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Because until it hits market, it’s almost meaningless. These journalists do the same shit with drugs in trials or early research.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I agree that before it’s a company selling a product it’s just dreams.

      However this is serious research. Skip the journo and open the nature.com link to the scientific article.

      For the ones not familiar with nature, it’s a highly regarded scientific magazine. Articles are written by researchers not journalists.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        The Nature paper says they’ve done a proof of concept with a few bits, and concluded that they can reproduce it with cutting edge processors. That’s akin to ‘Mice survive cancer longer’ becoming ‘We’ve cured cancer forever’.

        They might be right, but I’m not holding my breath.