• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    for starters, at the loads they’re running at, they have literally hundreds of gpu failures a day. How do you propose doing that in space?

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Include spares.

      I hope they’re reading this thread and taking notes, they probably didn’t think of that.

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        and the infrastructure and robotics to replace them, of course.

        Assuming 200 nvidia H100 failures a day (conservativo, reality is worse) that’s an extra ~340kg of weight you’d need to launch per day. Which is an extra 120 tons yearly.

          • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            at least two, you can’t stuff a rocket full of just gpus, you need something to actually dock and deliver the payload in space. So you need to launch at least 2 rockets (in a non-reusable configuration, so you need to pay for the whole rocket and the launch) to ship a bunch of gpus that are, at best, only 10% as fast as usual.