• AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    8 hours ago

    She feared the impact a theft charge, though small, would have on her financial career.

    Wild that a false accusation, after being proven as false at the court of law, can still impact one’s career.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      because when they run a background check on you they see you were charged. and that’s all that matters. you are untouchable to most employers.

      • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        In my country, employers have low trust and expectations on their new hires (and therefore low wages and high turnover) so they ask anyone applying for work to show up with what’s called a “police clearance” and a “NBI clearance” (NBI = National Bureau of Investigation, a less-sophisticated developing country equivalent of the FBI) documents to make sure they’re not felons.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s something that absolutely has to change. I don’t care if “career criminals get out of charges all the time”. A false charge should not follow you for the rest of your life.

        Then again, I also believe that if you serve your time in prison and are released, you should not have a publicly searchable record that can be used to deny you opportunities. So take my opinion as you will

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Agreed, and prison should be for rehabilitation.

          Perhaps prisoners could be released in one of two states: completed time or rehabilitated. The latter carries a much lower chance of recidivism. Maybe the first iffense could be hidden regardless, and expunged entirely after some period of time (10 years?), whereas on the second offense, both are searchable.

          IDK, but I do believe in forgiveness.

          • rami@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I think a lot about the Scandinavian prison where the guards forgot to lock the cells and the inmates used the night to do some baking.

        • rami@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I do agree on principle but somewhere in the back of my brain it’s going “what about repeat violent offenders.” But I feel like any solution I can come up with could be pretty easily used by the state as a force of marginalization anyway. So back at square one.

          • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            Even when it’s repeat violent offenders - why would you want to prevent them from getting jobs? What do you think will happen if you release them from prison, once they finish serving their sentence, and they can’t get jobs?

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            That’s good. These ideas of focusing on the potential career criminals are deeply ingrained in our culture, but when we challenge the potential outcomes we can resist giving the government and businesses more power to hurt innocent people