• porcoesphino@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Its a shame there is no license that forbids AI use. Well, there kind of are but none are common and probably wouldn’t hold up in court. Still, it would be nice to attach to work and communicate that the preference is to not have AI reuse

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      AI is predominantly classified as “fair use” in the US right now, so it wouldn’t even matter if you said “No AI” - copyright does not apply.

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That’s what I meant by “wouldn’t hold up in court”. Thanks for filling in the specifics. I wish it wasn’t classified as fair us, I think its an unfortunate way to avoid paying people for training data and that’s hiding the true cost of the system