cm0002@lemmings.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 days agoEx-CISA head thinks AI might fix code so fast we won't need security teams 😆️️www.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down13cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1450arrow-down1external-linkEx-CISA head thinks AI might fix code so fast we won't need security teams 😆️️www.theregister.comcm0002@lemmings.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 days agomessage-square90fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squaredeath_to_carrots@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·10 days agoIt takes a good person with a gun AI to stop a bad person with a gun AI.
minus-squareOpenStars@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·10 days agoYeah, good luck with that… 1+1=your mom I’m not holding out any hope for “good” AI for a very long time…
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-210 days agoI don’t think the poster means that, I think they are drawing parallels to the flaws of gun anti-regulation to AI. Both arguments are bad is the point
minus-squareOpenStars@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·10 days agoPerhaps I came on too strong but I took it as just joking around. But if the argument was to be real, then I note that a gun is actually quite an effective tool to accomplish its purpose, whereas AI is not truly “I”(ntelligent).
It takes a good person with
a gunAI to stop a bad person witha gunAI.Yeah, good luck with that…
1+1=your mom
I’m not holding out any hope for “good” AI for a very long time…
I don’t think the poster means that, I think they are drawing parallels to the flaws of gun anti-regulation to AI. Both arguments are bad is the point
Perhaps I came on too strong but I took it as just joking around.
But if the argument was to be real, then I note that a gun is actually quite an effective tool to accomplish its purpose, whereas AI is not truly “I”(ntelligent).