On Sept. 11, Michigan representatives proposed an internet content ban bill unlike any of the others we’ve seen: This particularly far-reaching legislation would ban not only many types of online content, but also the ability to legally use any VPN.

The bill, called the Anticorruption of Public Morals Act and advanced by six Republican representatives, would ban a wide variety of adult content online, ranging from ASMR and adult manga to AI content and any depiction of transgender people. It also seeks to ban all use of VPNs, foreign or US-produced.

Main issue I have with this article, and a lot of articles on this topic, is it doesn’t address the issue of youth access to porn. I think any semi-intelligent person knows this is a parenting issue, but unfortunately that cat’s out of the bag, thanks to the right. “Proliferation of porn” is the '90s crime scare (that never really died) all over again. If a politician or industry expert is speaking against bills like this, their talking points have to include:

  • Privacy-respecting alternatives that promise parents that their precious babies won’t be able to access that horrible dangerous porn! (I don’t argue that porn can’t be dangerous, but this is yet another disingenuous right-wing culture (holy) war)
  • Addressing that vagueness in the bill sets up the government as morality police (it’s right there in the title of the bill, FFS), and NOBODY in a “free” country should ever want that.
  • Stop saying it can be bypassed with technology. The VPN ban in this bill is a reaction to talking points like that.
  • Recognize and call out that this has nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with a religious minority imposing its will on the rest of the country (plenty of recent examples to pull from here).

Unfortunately this is becoming enough of “A Thing” that the left is going to have to, once again, be seen doing “something” about it. So they have to thread a needle of “protecting kids,” while respecting the privacy of their parents who want their kids protected and want to look at porn, and protecting businesses that require secure communications.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 days ago

    Um, how the actual fuck are businesses supposed to operate where some regressive dumbfucks have outlawed VPNs?

    Also, never underestimate the ability of a set of dumbasses doing some damage to this country - for one thing, see the asshole in the WH right now doing all kinds of self-owns to this country.

    Secondly, I’m old enough to remember things like the V-chip and the Clipper chip and the government going after Phil Zimmerman. All of these things were rather stupid. And that was during the Clinton administration, which, sure, they were right-leaning as well…were not fucking crazy right wing.

    • Airowird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Um, how the actual fuck are businesses supposed to operate where some regressive dumbfucks have outlawed VPNs?

      Hardwire connections in the office. Finally they’ll be able to undo all the good things that came from covid!! I mean, who doesn’t thrive in an environment where you’ll be constantly monitored so they can sell your work behavior for privately targetted ads? (/s, but only partial)

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I know a great many companies - especially larger ones - have forced people back to the office. I see also that the unhinged government has also force people to stop working remotely, for purely ideological reasons.

        But there are still a whole lot of people working from home, either fully, or as part of a hybrid arrangement.

        I’m assuming this regressive and idiotic bill would have carveouts for the “right” people to be “allowed” to use VPNs, but if they didn’t…wow. The business use for VPNs are more than just working from home.