• HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A man in an orange sweatshirt rushed the stage. He was not in law enforcement, but a Wikipedia contributor on the conference’s “trust and safety team”: Richard Knipel, the City University of New York’s “Wikimedian-in-residence.” He grabbed the gunman from behind.

    Another Wikipedian on the trust and safety team, Andrew Lih, had been standing watch in the aisle and charged forward, too.

    Wikipedia’s “Trust and Safety” team does NOT fuck around!

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I don’t get the idea of deliberately putting people in the jungle where there are no rules or morals or purpose out there… and then getting angry or surprised when they lash out at society.

    The reasons someone shouldn’t murder you live in society. X, Y, Z are why you don’t hurt others, and XYZ don’t exist in the jungle.

    We should only throw people out that are worth destroying, like Nazis.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    NYT’s title makes it out as if he was going to shoot others. He was going to shoot himself.

      • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        We should ban article sources for clickbait.

        Title: Trump bit off Putin’s ear!
        Article: The weather in Shitsbury will be sunny and cold in winter.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        A public suicide in the middle of a conference, with a sign around his neck anouncing the reason for it seems like something people would read about.

        I gotta say, I empathise with him on his cause too. We need to stop equating the act of child abuse with the innate sexual to children. You’d think that by this point in time, society would be ready to accept that sexual attraction is not something people have a choice over.

        • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          You’d think that by this point in time, society would be ready to accept that sexual attraction is not something people have a choice over.

          I understand what you’re saying, but society isn’t ever going to get to the point where they want to tackle this brain problem in a logical way.

          We have reached peak humanity.