cyrano@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoA cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inmantheoatmeal.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1466arrow-down115 cross-posted to: comicstrips@lemmy.world
arrow-up1451arrow-down1external-linkA cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inmantheoatmeal.comcyrano@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square90fedilink cross-posted to: comicstrips@lemmy.world
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·19 hours agoOption 2 is soulless. Option 3. Destroy the capitalists owned robots and bring the robots under the control of the working class.
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·18 hours agoOption 3 still ends up with robots and no-one doing the jobs that the robots replaced.
minus-squareJohanno@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·17 hours agoOption 3 would be a weird way of communism. Which still enforces my point. The reason why you fear for job safety is not the fault of technology.
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoOption 3 is also what the historical Luddites wanted. They liked technology when it benefitted them, not when it was used to exploit them.
Option 2 is soulless.
Option 3. Destroy the capitalists owned robots and bring the robots under the control of the working class.
Option 3 still ends up with robots and no-one doing the jobs that the robots replaced.
Robots aren’t the problem.
Option 3 would be a weird way of communism. Which still enforces my point. The reason why you fear for job safety is not the fault of technology.
Option 3 is also what the historical Luddites wanted. They liked technology when it benefitted them, not when it was used to exploit them.