• SteevyT@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah, although in this case, I’m not really sure what Strava expects to have happen. Garmin is orders of magnitude larger than them and hasn’t lost a patent lawsuit in like 15 years. The most likely outcome I see of this is that Strava goes from 26 patents to 24 patents.

    • Jul (they/she)@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Probably just to try to make Garmin’s product less useful in the short term while the case drags out. Or as a way to get Garmin to acquire them. Strava basically seems to have bought up some competitors that were failing and they have been on the way downhill. So at this stage usually these companies start cost cutting and using any means necessary to increase their perceived value for sale. This gives Garmin an incentive to buy them as that would end the lawsuit and they’d then acquire some additional defensive patents.