• gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    oh lol. so I installed Gentoo in 2007 or so on an AMD K6. I set the architecture to 686. Cause it’s a K6 right?

    build failed after a day of compiling. tried again and the build failed again. finally I read the docs and there’s an innocuous like saying all K6s are 586.

    What a waste. switched to Debian after some 3y of Gentoo. switched to arch after 10y of Debian. been on arch 6y now…

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I installed Gentoo 2004.3 under the watchful eye of a Gentoo developer. (Gentoo did come in handy because I was using amd64 Opterons before most binary distributions had 64-bit packages.) It also took me about 3 years to get tired of rebuilding world “continuously”. I similarly switch to Debian on 2007-11 and I’m writing this from that installation, just migrated across several generations of hardware.

      • gi1242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        honestly I loved Debian stable. unfortunately I got new hardware, and Debian stable didn’t support it. I hacked by on a combination of testing and backports for a bit. but it finally got too much and I made the switch…

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, I run a mixed (unsupported) system from time to time for hw support, but testing requires a lot for admin time than stable does, so I can certainly see that moving to something more malleable than stable. Arguably that’s what I’m doing while my system is mixed, since it’s not (supported) Debian.