Comments
Relevant legal documents
Source: Reddit- Private front-end.
(Eastern District of Michigan - Detroit)
My husband, Conrad Rockenhaus, is wrongly incarcerated in a county jail. I’m posting this here because you are one of the few communities that will understand the full technical and political reality of how he ended up there.
My husband is a former Tor operator, and at one point, he ran some of the fastest relays and exit nodes in the world.
This nightmare began when he refused to help the FBI decrypt traffic from his exit nodes.
Months later, the government arrested him. Their official reason? A minor, non-violent CFAA charge from an old workplace dispute that had nothing to do with Tor.
In fact, the statute of limitations was just a couple of months from expiring. It was a clear pretext to target him.
That minor charge was all they needed to get him into the system. To deny him bail, a U.S. Probation Officer in Texas lied under oath, telling a judge that Conrad had installed a “Linux OS called Spice” to “knock out their monitoring software” and access the “dark web.”
Here is the technical reality of their lie: The software was a standard SPICE graphics driver needed for his Ph.D. program. As many of you know, this is a basic utility for displaying graphics from a virtual machine. It is not an OS, has no connection to the dark web, and was technically incapable of interfering with their monitoring software.
The claim is a technical absurdity, equivalent to saying a mouse pad can hack a server.
Based on that lie alone, he was held in pre-trial detention for three years.
Now, the retaliation has escalated in Michigan. After I filed a formal complaint against his US probation officers for harassment, they used fraudulent warrants to jail my husband again.
During this violent arrest by US Marshals (who smashed in our windows and nearly shot my dog) he sustained a severe head injury that caused him to have a grand mal seizure in court. The jail’s “medical attention” was to ask him what year it was (he said 2023) and then send him back to his cell. He is being denied real medical care.
See videos:
- Feds threatening to sick dogs on us
- Feds beating by husband in the head
- Feds smashing in our windows
- Feds threaten to shoot my dog
- More threats to shoot my dog
To make matters worse, U.S. District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III has created a procedural trap that has stripped my husband of his right to a lawyer to fight for his life, health, or innocence. He is trapped in a constitutional and medical crisis.
I am not asking for money. I am asking for your help to amplify this story. You understand the technical truth and why this fight is so important.
We have all the evidence: the court transcript of the false testimony, the fraudulent warrants, the proof of medical neglect. It’s documented on my website:
TL;DR: My husband, a former Tor operator, refused to help the FBI decrypt Tor traffic. They retaliated by using an old, unrelated CFAA offense to arrest him and then lied about him using a "graphics driver to access the dark web” to keep him in pre-trial detention for 3 years. Now he’s been jailed again in Michigan on fraudulent violations, is being denied care for a head injury, and has no lawyer.
I need help getting the word out🙏
Adrienne Rockenhaus
For updates:
More Context from her comment:
Seeing a lot of questions and some misinformation in the comments, so I wanted to clarify a few key facts with sources:
- On the original case: My husband did not have a trial. He took a coerced guilty plea in Texas after being held for three years based on perjured testimony about a “SPICE graphics driver.” We have the court transcript proving the perjury on our website.
- On the violent arrest: The claim that my husband was “combative” is a complete fabrication, likely being spread to justify the U.S. Marshals’ actions. We have the unedited security camera footage of the entire raid, and it proves the opposite.
- On the relevance of Tor: The government’s retaliation against our family began after my husband, a Tor exit node operator, refused to help the FBI decrypt traffic. They then used an unrelated workplace dispute as the pretext for the initial charge. The entire case stems from his support for online privacy.
I’m seeing comments about a deeply offensive search term (“NAMBLA”) that the prosecution brought up in my husband’s 2020 hearing in Texas, and I want to address it directly so there is no confusion. The search was for an article my husband was writing for Encyclopedia Dramatica, a well-known (and very controversial) satirical wiki that parodies offensive topics. He was researching the topic to make fun of it, much like the show South Park did in a famous episode. The prosecution knew this search was irrelevant to the case, but they put it in front of the judge anyway . This is a classic “poison the well” tactic, using something shocking and out-of-context to prejudice a judge against a defendant. It’s a hallmark of a malicious prosecution. While they want everyone distracted by this, the real issues are the ones they can’t defend: the fraudulent warrants, the perjured testimony, the ongoing medical neglect, and the judge’s documented conflict of interest.
Edit: looks like OP addressed these concerns in an update. I don’t regret skepticism but it’s clearly an insane civil rights abuse, possibly to forcibly suppress privacy by targeting Tor Node operators directly. This is unprecedented, but also not surprising to me. Misinformation is one hell of a drug, read my post below anyways and don’t forget it had 20 upvotes before this edit. We all were fooled for a minute.
Original comment:
Another user brought up the witness testimony. I have no issue posting it because it’s critical to determining if this is a privacy violation or simply CSAM abuse, possibly the only useful function of the FBI anymore:
I did not get a sense after reading the testimony that the FBI had much wrongdoing here. Not saying we can completely trust the testimony or that Rockenhaus did bad things in reality. But that testimony was not even addressed by Mrs. Rockenhaus and therefore I’m immediately skeptical of anything she said about wrongful incarceration. This is not a high profile case where I’d suspect fuckery either, like Luigi Mangione. The FBI should not be violating our privacy, but they did not do that here, at least openly. They incarcerated a possible pedophile who happened to run Tor Nodes. Tor project themselves say running a Tor Node is unlikely to put you at risk.
If I were on a jury I’d be inclined to side with the witness and say Rockenhaus is possibly guilty of wrongdoing.
This country would be a lot better off if people defaulted to suspecting FBI/police fuckery until proven otherwise. This is much closer to the truth.
Searching for “NAMBLA” is not illegal and this whole comment is incredibly wrongheaded.
I do agree but I absolutely do not have “no reasonable doubt” after hearing that testimony. The long detention is a different and very serious civil rights issue and certainly wrong here. But also we cannot just let suspicious pedophilic activity go without questioning either.
If a Google search is all there is to the case then I’d vote Not Guilty on a jury, for sure. But it deserves a trial.
“No reasonable doubt” is the standard that needs to be met to convict someone, not declare their innocence.
I mean he’s innocent by default
A single search for NAMBLA deserves a jury trial?
Shit, I just typed it in a Lemmy post. I guess we need to have a trial to make sure I’m not involved in CSAM.
Is the entirety of your claim that he’s a pedofphle that he ran a TOR relay and search for NAMBLA once?
And that the claims of Mrs. Rockenhaus should be disregarded because she doesn’t address this testimony? Is there more material relevant in this testimony that you didn’t include? Because I don’t see why she would need to address what you included.
We don’t know if he is, it’s complicated. It’s worthy of a public trial for sure. I don’t have “no reasonable doubt”.
Her claims imply this is a wrongful detention when it seems worthy of a trial to me. We don’t know the specifics but the transcription implies he was belligerent and so potentially a flight risk. I don’t agree with the entire justice system but also it’s not as clear cut an injustice as she’s saying.
There’s video. There’s only so much the video angle can show, but I have my doubts.
A trial for what, exactly? Searching the name of a bad organization? Do you think that is a crime and thus a trial could result from it?
A trial for nothing, as I found out the whole thing is just a civil rights abuse pretty much.
No, he didn’t use the tor relay for that particular search.
Omission of evidence of crimes he committed certainly doesn’t look good.
Are you saying searching for NAMBLA is a crime?
Pedophilia is a crime, the organization advocates for the abolishment of age of consent laws. Searching for that information alone is completely harmless, of course, but that’s hardly the only sketchy thing about this dude and his case.
I understand that pedophilia is a crime. He searched for NAMBLA which is not. That is the only thing that is even remotely sketchy that you provided. Your entire argument is insinuations and tone.
No, but it’s suspicious given the details of his case. Why would he search that when he knew he was being monitored? I have questions.
Literally asking for the details organized as an argument. Is that even the case the government is building?
I think she’s just doing her best to defend him, I don’t blame her. But it’s much more complicated than that.
Searching man boy love is not the same as engaging in it. For instance, you just searched man boy love when you read this. You sick fuck.
Yeah there was an episode of south park about it probably 20 years ago.
I probably googled it at the time, to see if it was a real club.
Straight to jail.
i remember that episode lol, the north american marlon brando look alikes
I actually did not 😎 and if that’s all there is then sure, it’s a not guilty verdict.
Do you understand that even pedophiles have rights? FBI can’t use excessive force arrest, lie under oath, 3 goddam years of pre-trial detention and medical negligence just because he is the bad guy.
Justice system shouldn’t work like that, especially on a person who committed no violent crime at all.
The excessive force is a civil rights injustice, yes. We do not know the details of the case but it certainly deserves a trial.
Pedophiles are not criminals by default but his behavior is highly suspicious and I have questions.
Isn’t that search a reference to a South Park episode?
Ironically, I thought it was a South Park meme too and then I just Googled it.
I’ll tell FBI hello for you guys, see you in 15-25 years.
The org is real and was made fun of by south park
Well I’d look it up to see if it was real, but that would apparently make me guilty of pedophilia according to OP.
Exactly, one of the above commenters proclaims guilt because of a search query of that name, of which the commenter almost certainly searched that himself. I have searched all sorts of things I do not support and am even hostile to.
I did not proclaim guilt based on a search query. I proclaimed I do not have “no reasonable doubt” and it’s worthy of a trial.
Holy crap, I can’t believe someone would actually make an org with that name 🤦
It was a weird thing from the 70s if that helps. I don’t think it’s seriously been a thing since the 80s but idk. Had to look this up when I was a young queer activist because people would bring it up. Smh.
If it is, I wouldn’t be using my computer to search it if I was being monitored. Your point is he’s probably innocent. It’s possible but I do not have “no reasonable doubt” any more.
Actually if possible I’d avoid unnecessary internet searches completely during the period of being monitored. Privacy tools or bust.