Great writing on the current Reddit saga. The author put down in words a lot of things in my mind I couldn’t find the right words.

  • Honeyed Coffee@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is community engagement better in a interconnected forum compared to a single forum consisting of all the participants? I’m asking out of ignorance

    How would cross community discussions take place?

    • pre@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @honeyed_coffee For the reasons the OP mentioned. Familiar faces, being recognized in a community instead of being just today’s main character.

      In a single large forum most participants are silent, as they must be or it’d be a cacophony. Many are silent out of worry that they need to say something good enough to impress a hundred thousand people, not just something interesting to their local 100 friends.

      On Fediverse things escape their local instances and their local forum-groups by boosts mostly.

      @Zigabyte

      • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As karma mattered more you lost a whole subset of regular posters that felt kamra took a relaxing pastime and made it into a job. Karma was used as a kind of stopgap for the issue of managing the cacophony in a busy thread, which made the points matter even more and caused even more people to disengage.

        • RandomBit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally, I found that karma led to self-censorship of any idea that remotely deviated from the group consensus.

          • Honeyed Coffee@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can you think of alternatives to voting, though? Sorting always requires some curating system that isn’t random but I can’t think of any that would be robust to group consensus

            • RandomBit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think user voting in of itself is a problem. It’s the consequences of large negative voting that causes the real problems. In Reddit, a single unpopular comment on a popular subreddit could send a casual Redditor into negative karma which effectively shadowbans them from Reddit. As a result, you see people deleting their comments to stop the bleeding. Controversial opinions are punished severely.