• hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Demanding sources for something you disbelieve on points tangential to the point is something people that want to derail your argument do to put you on the defensive without cause.

    As if I care that you believe the cops are trustworthy or not. The barrels should be tested independently.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The cops aren’t the ones who tested the barrels. But feel free to keep rearranging the goal posts about backing up a claim with anything of substance.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Contracting to a private company amounts to the same thing. If they do not have anything to hide they should have no problem retesting it independently.

        I do not doubt they privatize more and more law enforcement operations so they can pay more for less with worse service.

        Speaking of which, that gives them less credibility not more if it is contracted out. That is less to anybody that has followed events and understands them.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If anyone the police pay to test things is automatically suspect, how are the police to test anything in a way that you’d trust?

          According to the article, the barrels were independently tested at the request of the defense, which is why we have this whole story in the first place. What would more independent testing accomplish at this point?