cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36863320

Comments

Viber, WeTalk, TikTok, Nimbuzz, and Poppo Live are already registered.

Similarly, Telegram and Global Diary are in the process of registration.

Social media platforms to be blocked:

  1. Facebook
  2. Facebook Messenger
  3. Instagram
  4. YouTube
  5. WhatsApp
  6. X (formerly Twitter)
  7. LinkedIn
  8. Snapchat
  9. Reddit
  10. Discord
  11. Pinterest
  12. Signal
  13. Threads
  14. WeChat
  15. Quora
  16. Tumblr
  17. Clubhouse
  18. Mastodon
  19. Rumble
  20. MeWe
  21. VK
  22. Line
  23. IMO
  24. Zalo
  25. Soul
  26. Hamro Patro
Other Sources
  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am curious how they are planning to ban Mastodon. I am assuming they are going to block say the top 25 instances?

    • magguzu@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hate to say it but it honestly doesn’t sound crazy hard to just block any instance that pops up. Yes it’s whack a mole but if it’s an automated script, it can just crawl through a backdoor instance and ban any domain it sees.

      • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah that’s a solved problem. Iran, Russia, China and other countries have gone through this “stages of denial” process years ago. It starts with “haha they are incompetent and can’t block everything” and 10 years later half the Internet is blocked and you have prison sentencing for accessing “illegal” information (for the flgood of the people of course). Anyone who claims that internet censorship is not possible is a naive person fortunate enough to live in a place where it’s not a thing.

        “IT people/programmers are furry gay liberals” is a myth. There are plenty of bootlickers among them, like in any large enough group of people that’s not defined by a specific ideology/political affiliation.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          As someone who is friends with many furry gay liberal IT dudes and dudettes.

          I can’t name a single one that wouldn’t bend the knee the moment their job is threatened and their option is getting fired and risking their entire career or just being a good cog in the machine.

          The people who bend the knee the fastest tend to be the ones most at risk of being abused by the powers that be should they not comply. It’s the very fundamental reason that revolutions tend to be so explosive. There’s a LONG build up of people not pushing against authority because of fear and security.

          So till the breaking point where the gay furry liberals have no options and it’s death or do what their bosses tell them. You can full well expect them to work right along with the bootlickers. They just are going to bitch about it more in the break room then the bootlickers.

        • sqgl@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They will block all instances except the ones registered. They just want a point of contact for when there is illegal activity. Yes it becomes a problem if they make criticizing the government legal but it is a democracy for now.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And as we all know, that would not ban it entirely. They’d have to block every instance, every new instance that comes online, the main web page, the code repository, etc., to even have a hope of banning it.

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are sites dedicated to listing all federated lemmy instances. Knowing the FOSS nerds, surely there’s even an API already.

        Some might slip, but very few large ones. That’s if the government cares about lemmy

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The fact it’s interconnected makes it easy to just worm your way though banning everything.

          Doesn’t matter if it’s all independently hosted. The greatest strength of the frediverse is the fact it’s federated.

          That also it’s biggest fuck up point. These arent wholely independent forums.

          And if the frediverse has to fully defederate everything to prevent itself from being scrubbed away. It defeats the entire fucking point.

          Cause at that point just fucking go back to forums.

          • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I think they best solution here is just easy to deploy proxies, it prevents banning by DNS or IP. More than that and they might as well just put the great firewall.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The problem is that if you can access one, you can access all of them. It doesn’t even matter how you access the one. Even if you access it over tor, as long as you can get to one instance, you’re in the Federation.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Mastodon’s main code repo is on GitHub, a government could just pressure MS to take down that repo, although that isn’t going to account for anyone self-hosting an instance and also hosting their own git repos outside of any of the major hosts.

        In order to take down self-hosted instances, they’d have to raid people’s homes and take out their physical servers assuming they have physical servers in their place.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m betting GitHub is not the only place that the code repo is mirrored. Sure, it might be there, but something tells me it’s on a bunch of people’s computers as well, for people who work on it, or have just forked the repository. And there’s probably even copies of it on other mirrors, such as Code Bird, etc. in private repositories.

        • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t know when Microsoft would cave, but Nepal asking them to remove it probably isn’t going to that level. Maybe they geoblock but I can’t see them removing it for a everyone.

        • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          assuming they have physical servers in their place.

          Nope, in that particular case they just have to hand over a strongly worded letter (and a small bribe) to the ISP.