• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think it boils down to “consent” and “remuneration”.

    I run a website, that I do not consent to being accessed for LLMs. However, should LLMs use my content, I should be compensated for such use.

    So, these LLM startups ignore both consent, and the idea of remuneration.

    Most of these concepts have already been figured out for the purpose of law, if we consider websites much akin to real estate: Then, the typical trespass laws, compensatory usage, and hell, even eminent domain if needed ie, a city government can “take over” the boosted post feature to make sure alerts get pushed as widely and quickly as possible.

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That all sounds very vague to me, and I don’t expect it to be captured properly by law any time soon. Being accessed for LLM? What does it mean for you and how is it different from being accessed by a user? Imagine you host a weather forecast. If that information is public, what kind of compensation do you expect from anyone or anything who accesses that data?

      Is it okay for a person to access your site? Is it okay for a script written by that person to fetch data every day automatically? Would it be okay for a user to dump a page of your site with a headless browser? Would it be okay to let an LLM take a look at it to extract info required by a user? Have you heard about changedetection.io project? If some of these sound unfair to you, you might want to put a DRM on your data or something.

      Would you expect a compensation from me after reading your comment?