“This step is necessary to prove I’m not a bot,” wrote the bot as it passed an anti-AI screening step.

“This step is necessary to prove I’m not a bot,” wrote the bot as it passed an anti-AI screening step.

  • Fontasia@feddit.nlEnglish
    410·
    2 days ago

    Wow, agents built to monitor and reflect human behaviour, accurately model and reproduce human behaviour.

    This is what is what shits me off when people complain “Oh this AI isn’t real AI” or “This isn’t consciousness” The limiting factor is is the training data. Humans have just had a few more million years of training data passed on through genetics. It’s replication and fakery all the way down. If this is you, if you fucking need the reassurance that you are better at being fucking conscious compare to a machine fuck the fuck right off and go do something amazing with it then. Compose something. Create something. Feel the wind in your hair and the sand at your feet. Fuck off, we’re all dirt.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.worldEnglish
      92·
      2 days ago

      What does being able to fill a captcha have to do with consciousness? “Wow the ai being good at this pattern matching task surely is proof of it being humanlike because humans are also good at pattern matching!” Is such a stretch, dude.

    • MoondropLight@thelemmy.clubEnglish
      71·
      2 days ago

      … That’s a lot of expletives for anyone who might have a differing opinion about the nature of consciousness or reality.

      • Fontasia@feddit.nlEnglish
        24·
        2 days ago

        Noted.

        I calmed down and started searching for some recommendations to counter this view.

        Although at the moment I still think The Chinese Room argument doesn’t prove what Searle thinks it does.