I thought it was particularly funny how the first of these articles is saying that it is/was a good time to try for a carbon tax again and that the alternatives are essentially inadequate, while the second one says:
[…] Importantly, they found most emissions reduction relied on a mix of policies. The results point to a way forward for Australia, where an economy-wide carbon price is currently politically impossible.
I don’t think I made use of that juxtaposition in my assignment but now I can use it to write a comment which four people will read :'D
Whether the author of article 1 is right (it’s close to a silver bullet policy and is politically feasible) or whether the author of article 2 is right (it’s both not a silver bullet and politically impossible) I don’t know.
Some related reading from The Conversation that I liked when I was doing exploratory background reading for some related uni work a few months back:
I thought it was particularly funny how the first of these articles is saying that it is/was a good time to try for a carbon tax again and that the alternatives are essentially inadequate, while the second one says:
I don’t think I made use of that juxtaposition in my assignment but now I can use it to write a comment which four people will read :'D
Whether the author of article 1 is right (it’s close to a silver bullet policy and is politically feasible) or whether the author of article 2 is right (it’s both not a silver bullet and politically impossible) I don’t know.
I read your comment. I wonder if I’m the first, second, third or fourth reader.
Thanks for
watchingreading - remember tolike and subscribedownvote and unsubscribe